Every week I scan through all kinds of stories looking for something of interest for this program. I will skim and reject about ninety percent of the stories I read. There are lots of reasons for it. Some of them are too complex for a program of this length. Some are outside my area of knowledge. Some are just boring.
This past week I was about to skim by a story about cable news network CNN being sued in Florida court. It involves a story from 2015 about a pediatric surgery center in Palm Beach Florida. Didn’t ring any of my bells for inclusion here. But the current fight in that court did. CNN is doing everything in its power to make sure that its internal editorial policies are not included in the official court record. When those documents were subpoenaed, the network produced a heavily edited version that was listed as “Attorney’s Eyes Only”. That means that the plaintiff, a surgeon who the original story claimed acted in a manner unfit for a doctor and surgeon, can’t see them.
That piqued my interest. Why would they fight so hard to keep those a secret? CNN claims they contain information that is “privileged, confidential and proprietary”. In the editorial policies? That made no sense.
A little further reading revealed that apparently the same attitude can be found at CBS, ABC and Fox News. The story I read said that NBC simply refused to answer the question. What is going on?
My confusion deepened when I discovered that folks like the New York Times, the Washington Post and even online news source BuzzFeed publish their guidelines in detail.
CNN, along with other news agencies, has demanded transparency from people and organizations in the news many times. The appearance that such a standard is for everyone else and not the network is appalling to me. I’ve spoken here before about the work the journalistic world needs to be doing to regain the trust of the public. Buzzfeed is clear that they publish their standards to, quoting now, “…keep BuzzFeed News writers, reporters and editors accountable to our readers” end of quote.
That’s exactly the stance that any news organization should take. Further research showed that many news organizations take that stance and have done so for years.
There have been questions about how CNN chooses to cherry pick when and how their standards apply. There shouldn’t be anything in those standards that couldn’t be shared with their viewers.
If CNN is unwilling to be transparent about how they cover the news, where do they get off demanding it of anyone else?
Leave a comment