I have spoken many times over the last few years about how I believe this is the “golden age” for creative types. There are more ways to get what you do in front of an audience than ever before. And there are more services dedicated to helping you do just that.
That particular line of thought may have taken a step or two backwards last week. At a time when YouTube has been facing a lot of criticism about what is going out on its service, its first step strikes me as an odd choice.
As we mentioned here a couple weeks ago, YouTube came under scrutiny following the Logan Paul fiasco over the video posted of a presumed dead body in Japan (among other things). It took the Google subsidiary almost a week before the video was pulled.
YouTube, and many other huge social media sites have an ongoing problem keeping an eye on what is posted. The process is called “moderation”, meaning an outside moderator is supposed to keep an eye out for violations of the community standards. Unfortunately, this is commonly handled by low level and low paid staffers working with a vague set of guidelines, or left to computer routines programmed to look for specific issues. The video-sharing website has promised to increase the number of moderators to ten thousand this year. Given that YouTube has a financial interest in creating channels like Paul’s with enormous followings, it will be interesting to see which ideal comes out on top.
The first move is puzzling. YouTube has increased both the number of subscribers and viewing hours for channels to become business partners, called “monetising”. This is a blow not to the big channels like Paul’s but many, many smaller channels who were able to make some money before but will be frozen out now. The rules for smaller channels have changed twice now inside a year, with the standards getting tougher to reach each time.
The problem is that the solution doesn’t actually match, well, the problem. YouTube’s high profile problems come from high profile channels that easily overtop the new standards. While the website hasn’t made a response to the uproar that has greeted the change, the initial statement on their Creator’s blog appears to equate less popular channels with bad behavior. They claim that a core value “…is to provide anyone the opportunity to earn money from a thriving channel”.
Given that all of their recent problems have come from the channels that seem to be thriving best, the solution seems to be upside down.
But at least they’ve taken the Tide pod challenge videos down.
Leave a comment